ABCD Study publications are authored by ABCD investigators, collaborators, and non-ABCD researchers. The analysis methodologies, findings, and interpretations expressed in these publications are those of the authors and do not constitute an endorsement by the ABCD Study®.
Please note that the publications listed here include empirical as well as non-empirical papers (e.g., focused review articles, editorials).
Read More |
Title | Journal | Authors | Year | Details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toggle | Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Bagot KS, Matthews SA, Mason M, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractMobile and wearable technologies and novel methods of data collection are innovating health-related research. These technologies and methods allow for multi-system level capture of data across environmental, physiological, behavioral, and psychological domains. In the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, there is great potential for harnessing the acceptability, accessibility, and functionality of mobile and social technologies for in-vivo data capture to precisely measure factors, and interactions between factors, that contribute to childhood and adolescent neurodevelopment and psychosocial and health outcomes. Here we discuss advances in mobile and wearable technologies and methods of analysis of geospatial, ecologic, social network and behavioral data. Incorporating these technologies into the ABCD study will allow for interdisciplinary research on the effects of place, social interactions, environment, and substance use on health and developmental outcomes in children and adolescents. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/03/28AuthorsBagot KS, Matthews SA, Mason M, Squeglia LM, Fowler J, Gray K, Herting M, May A, Colrain I, Godino J, Tapert S, Brown S, Patrick KKeywordsABCD, Child development, Child health, Mobile technology, Social media, Wearable sensorsDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.008 |
|||||
Toggle | Assessment of culture and environment in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Rationale, description of measures, and early data. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Zucker RA, Gonzalez R, Feldstein Ewing SW, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractNeurodevelopmental maturation takes place in a social environment in addition to a neurobiological one. Characterization of social environmental factors that influence this process is therefore an essential component in developing an accurate model of adolescent brain and neurocognitive development, as well as susceptibility to change with the use of marijuana and other drugs. The creation of the Culture and Environment (CE) measurement component of the ABCD protocol was guided by this understanding. Three areas were identified by the CE Work Group as central to this process: influences relating to CE Group membership, influences created by the proximal social environment, influences stemming from social interactions. Eleven measures assess these influences, and by time of publication, will have been administered to well over 7,000 9-10 year-old children and one of their parents. Our report presents baseline data on psychometric characteristics (mean, standard deviation, range, skewness, coefficient alpha) of all measures within the battery. Effectiveness of the battery in differentiating 9-10 year olds who were classified as at higher and lower risk for marijuana use in adolescence was also evaluated. Psychometric characteristics on all measures were good to excellent; higher vs. lower risk contrasts were significant in areas where risk differentiation would be anticipated. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/03/17AuthorsZucker RA, Gonzalez R, Feldstein Ewing SW, Paulus MP, Arroyo J, Fuligni A, Morris AS, Sanchez M, Wills TKeywordsAcculturation, Cultural identity, Family effects, Social interaction, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.004 |
|||||
Toggle | Biospecimens and the ABCD study: Rationale, methods of collection, measurement and early data. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Uban KA, Horton MK, Jacobus J, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractBiospecimen collection in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study – of hair samples, shed deciduous (baby) teeth, and body fluids – will serve dual functions of screening for study eligibility, and providing measures of biological processes thought to predict or correlate with key study outcomes on brain and cognitive development. Biosamples are being collected annually to screen for recency of drug use prior to the neuroimaging or cognitive testing visit, and to store for the following future studies: (1) on the effects of exposure to illicit and recreational drugs (including alcohol and nicotine); (2) of pubertal hormones on brain and cognitive developmental trajectories; (3) on the contribution of genomics and epigenomics to child and adolescent development and behavioral outcomes; and (4) with pre- and post-natal exposure to environmental neurotoxicants and drugs of abuse measured from novel tooth analyses. The present manuscript describes the rationales for inclusion and selection of the specific biospecimens, methodological considerations for each measure, future plans for assessment of biospecimens during follow-up visits, and preliminary ABCD data to illustrate methodological considerations. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/03/16AuthorsUban KA, Horton MK, Jacobus J, Heyser C, Thompson WK, Tapert SF, Madden PAF, Sowell ERKeywordsABCD study, Biospecimens, Environmental exposures, Genetics, Gonadal hormones, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.005 |
|||||
Toggle | The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Casey BJ, Cannonier T, Conley MI, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractThe ABCD study is recruiting and following the brain development and health of over 10,000 9-10 year olds through adolescence. The imaging component of the study was developed by the ABCD Data Analysis and Informatics Center (DAIC) and the ABCD Imaging Acquisition Workgroup. Imaging methods and assessments were selected, optimized and harmonized across all 21 sites to measure brain structure and function relevant to adolescent development and addiction. This article provides an overview of the imaging procedures of the ABCD study, the basis for their selection and preliminary quality assurance and results that provide evidence for the feasibility and age-appropriateness of procedures and generalizability of findings to the existent literature. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/03/14AuthorsCasey BJ, Cannonier T, Conley MI, Cohen AO, Barch DM, Heitzeg MM, Soules ME, Teslovich T, Dellarco DV, Garavan H, Orr CA, Wager TD, Banich MT, Speer NK, Sutherland MT, Riedel MC, Dick AS, Bjork JM, Thomas KM, Chaarani B, Mejia MH, Hagler DJ, Daniela Cornejo M, Sicat CS, Harms MP, Dosenbach NUF, Rosenberg M, Earl E, Bartsch H, Watts R, Polimeni JR, Kuperman JM, Fair DA, Dale AMKeywordsAddiction, Adolescence, Development, Impulsivity, Memory, RewardDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001 |
|||||
Toggle | Adolescent Brain Development: Implications for Understanding Risk and Resilience Processes Through Neuroimaging Research. | Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence | Morris AS, Squeglia LM, Jacobus J, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractThis special section focuses on research that utilizes neuroimaging methods to examine the impact of social relationships and socioemotional development on adolescent brain function. Studies include novel neuroimaging methods that further our understanding of adolescent brain development. This special section has a particular focus on how study findings add to our understanding of risk and resilience. In this introduction to the special section, we discuss the role of neuroimaging in developmental science and provide a brief review of neuroimaging methods. We present key themes that are covered in the special section articles including: (1) emerging methods in developmental neuroscience, (2) emotion-cognition interaction, and (3) the role of social relationships in brain function. We conclude our introduction with future directions for integrating developmental neuroscience into the study of adolescence, and highlight key points from the special section’s commentaries which include information on the landmark Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. JournalJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on AdolescencePublished2018/03/01AuthorsMorris AS, Squeglia LM, Jacobus J, Silk JSKeywordsDOI10.1111/jora.12379 |
|||||
Toggle | The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. | Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence | Jernigan TL, Brown SA, Dowling GJ | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractJournalJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on AdolescencePublished2018/03/01AuthorsJernigan TL, Brown SA, Dowling GJKeywordsDOI10.1111/jora.12374 |
|||||
Toggle | Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Luciana M, Bjork JM, Nagel BJ, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractAdolescence is characterized by numerous social, hormonal and physical changes, as well as a marked increase in risk-taking behaviors. Dual systems models attribute adolescent risk-taking to tensions between developing capacities for cognitive control and motivational strivings, which may peak at this time. A comprehensive understanding of neurocognitive development during the adolescent period is necessary to permit the distinction between premorbid vulnerabilities and consequences of behaviors such as substance use. Thus, the prospective assessment of cognitive development is fundamental to the aims of the newly launched Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Consortium. This paper details the rationale for ABC’lected measures of neurocognition, presents preliminary descriptive data on an initial sample of 2299 participants, and provides a context for how this large-scale project can inform our understanding of adolescent neurodevelopment. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/02/21AuthorsLuciana M, Bjork JM, Nagel BJ, Barch DM, Gonzalez R, Nixon SJ, Banich MTKeywordsAdolescence, Longitudinal, NIH Toolbox, Neurocognition, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.006 |
|||||
Toggle | Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Lisdahl KM, Sher KJ, Conway KP, et al. | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractOne of the objectives of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org/) is to establish a national longitudinal cohort of 9 and 10 year olds that will be followed for 10 years in order to prospectively study the risk and protective factors influencing substance use and its consequences, examine the impact of substance use on neurocognitive, health and psychosocial outcomes, and to understand the relationship between substance use and psychopathology. This article provides an overview of the ABCD Study Substance Use Workgroup, provides the goals for the workgroup, rationale for the substance use battery, and includes details on the substance use module methods and measurement tools used during baseline, 6-month and 1-year follow-up assessment time-points. Prospective, longitudinal assessment of these substance use domains over a period of ten years in a nationwide sample of youth presents an unprecedented opportunity to further understand the timing and interactive relationships between substance use and neurocognitive, health, and psychopathology outcomes in youth living in the United States. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/02/21AuthorsLisdahl KM, Sher KJ, Conway KP, Gonzalez R, Feldstein Ewing SW, Nixon SJ, Tapert S, Bartsch H, Goldstein RZ, Heitzeg MKeywordsAdolescent, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, Alcohol, Assessment, Cannabis, Child, Drug use, Inhalants, Longitudinal, Marijuana, Methods, Nicotine, Prescription drug use, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.007 |
|||||
Toggle | Introduction. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Jernigan TL, Brown SA | 2018 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractThe Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is a longitudinal, observational study of over 10,000 youth recruited at 21 sites throughout the United States. Comprehensive biennial assessments and more limited interim assessments measure health, mental health, neurocognition, family, cultural and environmental variables, substance use, genetic and other biomarkers, and structural and functional brain development. Within this Special Issue, readers will find much information about the rationale and objectives of the study, the broad ranging assessment protocols and new as well as traditional methodologies applied at baseline, the recruitment and retention strategies, and the anticipated final composition of the cohort. Information is also provided about how the study is coordinated and conducted, how decisions are made, how data quality is monitored, and how ethical standards are protected. In this introduction we will focus instead on the position of the ABCD Study in the changing landscape of biomedical research. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2018/02/15AuthorsJernigan TL, Brown SAKeywordsDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.002 |
|||||
Toggle | The adolescent brain cognitive development study external advisory board. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Charness ME | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractJournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/12/28AuthorsCharness MEKeywordsDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.12.007 |
|||||
Toggle | Approaching Retention within the ABCD Study. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Feldstein Ewing SW, Chang L, Cottler LB, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractRetention efforts are critical to maintain relationships with research participants over time. This is especially important for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, where families are asked to stay engaged with the study throughout the course of 10 years. This high-degree of involvement is essential to longitudinally track child and adolescent development. At a minimum, we will connect with families every 6 months by telephone, and every year in person, with closer contact with the youth directly as they transition into adolescence. Differential retention, when related to non-random issues pertaining to demographic or risk features, can negatively impact the generalizability of study outcomes. Thus, to ensure high rates of retention for all participants, the ABCD study employs a number of efforts to support youth and families. This overview details the framework and concrete steps for retention. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/11/11AuthorsFeldstein Ewing SW, Chang L, Cottler LB, Tapert SF, Dowling GJ, Brown SAKeywordsABCD study, Adolescents, Longitudinal, Multi-site, RetentionDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.004 |
|||||
Toggle | Demographic, physical and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: Rationale and description. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Barch DM, Albaugh MD, Avenevoli S, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractThe Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study incorporates a comprehensive range of measures assessing predictors and outcomes related to both mental and physical health across childhood and adolescence. The workgroup developed a battery that would assess a comprehensive range of domains that address study aims while minimizing participant and family burden. We review the major considerations that went into deciding what constructs to cover in the demographics, physical health and mental health domains, as well as the process of selecting measures, piloting and refining the originally proposed battery. We present a description of the baseline battery, as well as the six-month interim assessments and the one-year follow-up assessments. This battery includes assessments from the perspectives of both the parent and the target youth, as well as teacher reports. This battery will provide a foundational baseline assessment of the youth’s current function so as to permit characterization of stability and change in key domains over time. The findings from this battery will also be utilized to identify both resilience markers that predict healthy development and risk factors for later adverse outcomes in physical health, mental health, and substance use and abuse. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/11/03AuthorsBarch DM, Albaugh MD, Avenevoli S, Chang L, Clark DB, Glantz MD, Hudziak JJ, Jernigan TL, Tapert SF, Yurgelun-Todd D, Alia-Klein N, Potter AS, Paulus MP, Prouty D, Zucker RA, Sher KJKeywordsAssessment, Mental health, Physical health, PsychopathologyDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.010 |
|||||
Toggle | The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Volkow ND, Koob GF, Croyle RT, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractAdolescence is a time of dramatic changes in brain structure and function, and the adolescent brain is highly susceptible to being altered by experiences like substance use. However, there is much we have yet to learn about how these experiences influence brain development, how they promote or interfere with later health outcomes, or even what healthy brain development looks like. A large longitudinal study beginning in early adolescence could help us understand the normal variability in adolescent brain and cognitive development and tease apart the many factors that influence it. Recent advances in neuroimaging, informatics, and genetics technologies have made it feasible to conduct a study of sufficient size and scope to answer many outstanding questions. At the same time, several Institutes across the NIH recognized the value of collaborating in such a project because of its ability to address the role of biological, environmental, and behavioral factors like gender, pubertal hormones, sports participation, and social/economic disparities on brain development as well as their association with the emergence and progression of substance use and mental illness including suicide risk. Thus, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study was created to answer the most pressing public health questions of our day. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/10/10AuthorsVolkow ND, Koob GF, Croyle RT, Bianchi DW, Gordon JA, Koroshetz WJ, Pérez-Stable EJ, Riley WT, Bloch MH, Conway K, Deeds BG, Dowling GJ, Grant S, Howlett KD, Matochik JA, Morgan GD, Murray MM, Noronha A, Spong CY, Wargo EM, Warren KR, Weiss SRBKeywordsAdolescent, Brain development, Longitudinal, Mental health, Neuroimaging, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.002 |
|||||
Toggle | The utility of twins in developmental cognitive neuroscience research: How twins strengthen the ABCD research design. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Iacono WG, Heath AC, Hewitt JK, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractThe ABCD twin study will elucidate the genetic and environmental contributions to a wide range of mental and physical health outcomes in children, including substance use, brain and behavioral development, and their interrelationship. Comparisons within and between monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs, further powered by multiple assessments, provide information about genetic and environmental contributions to developmental associations, and enable stronger tests of causal hypotheses, than do comparisons involving unrelated children. Thus a sub-study of 800 pairs of same-sex twins was embedded within the overall Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) design. The ABCD Twin Hub comprises four leading centers for twin research in Minnesota, Colorado, Virginia, and Missouri. Each site is enrolling 200 twin pairs, as well as singletons. The twins are recruited from registries of all twin births in each State during 2006-2008. Singletons at each site are recruited following the same school-based procedures as the rest of the ABCD study. This paper describes the background and rationale for the ABCD twin study, the ascertainment of twin pairs and implementation strategy at each site, and the details of the proposed analytic strategies to quantify genetic and environmental influences and test hypotheses critical to the aims of the ABCD study. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/09/12AuthorsIacono WG, Heath AC, Hewitt JK, Neale MC, Banich MT, Luciana MM, Madden PA, Barch DM, Bjork JMKeywordsBrain function, Brain structure, Environment, Heritability, Substance use, TwinsDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.001 |
|||||
Toggle | Biomedical ethics and clinical oversight in multisite observational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents: The ABCD experience. | Developmental cognitive neuroscience | Clark DB, Fisher CB, Bookheimer S, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractObservational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents may identify neurological anomalies and other clinically relevant findings. Planning for the management of this information involves ethical considerations that may influence informed consent, confidentiality, and communication with participants about assessment results. Biomedical ethics principles include respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Each project presents unique challenges. The Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study (ABCD) collaborators have systematically developed recommendations with written guidelines for identifying and responding to potential risks that adhere to biomedical ethics principles. To illustrate, we will review the ABCD approach to three areas: (1) hazardous substance use; (2) neurological anomalies; and (3) imminent potential for self-harm or harm to others. Each ABCD site is responsible for implementing procedures consistent with these guidelines in accordance with their Institutional Review Board approved protocols, state regulations, and local resources. To assure that each site has related plans and resources in place, site emergency procedures manuals have been developed, documented and reviewed for adherence to ABCD guidelines. This article will describe the principles and process used to develop these ABCD bioethics and medical oversight guidelines, the concerns and options considered, and the resulting approaches advised to sites. JournalDevelopmental cognitive neurosciencePublished2017/06/28AuthorsClark DB, Fisher CB, Bookheimer S, Brown SA, Evans JH, Hopfer C, Hudziak J, Montoya I, Murray M, Pfefferbaum A, Yurgelun-Todd DKeywordsAdolescence, Clinical oversight, Ethics, Magnetic resonance imaging, Substance useDOI10.1016/j.dcn.2017.06.005 |
|||||
Toggle | The ABCD study of neurodevelopment: Identifying neurocircuit targets for prevention and treatment of adolescent substance abuse. | Current treatment options in psychiatry | Bjork JM, Straub LK, Provost RG, et al. | 2017 | |
PubMed Record
AbstractSubstance use disorders (SUD) can be considered developmental disorders in light of their frequent origins in substance initiation during adolescence. Cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of adolescent substance users or adolescents with SUD have indicated aberrations in brain structures or circuits implicated in motivation, self-control, and mood-regulation. However, attributing these differences to the neurotoxicological effects of chronic substance use has been problematic in that these circuits are also aberrant in at-risk children, such as those with prenatal substance exposure, externalizing disorders (such as conduct disorder), or prodromal internalizing disorders such as depression. To better isolate the effects of substance exposure on the adolescent brain, the newly-launched Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, funded by the National Institutes of Health, will follow the neurodevelopmental trajectories of over 11,000 American 9/10-year-olds for 10 years, into emerging adulthood. This study will provide a rich open-access dataset on longitudinal interactions of neurodevelopment, environmental exposures, and childhood psychopathology that confer addiction risk. The ABCD twin study will further clarify genetic versus experiential influences (e.g., substance use) on neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes. Neurocircuitry thought to regulate mood and behavior has been directly normalized by administration of psychoactive medications and by cognitive therapies in adults. Because of this, we contend that ABCD project data will be a crucial resource for prevention and treatment of SUD in adolescence because its cutting-edge neuroimaging and childhood assessments hold potential for discovery of additional targetable brain differences earlier in development that are prognostic of (or aberrant in) SUD. The ABCD sample size will also have the power to illuminate how sex differences, environmental interactions and other individual differences interact with neurodevelopment to inform treatment in different groups of adolescents. JournalCurrent treatment options in psychiatryPublished2017/04/20AuthorsBjork JM, Straub LK, Provost RG, Neale MCKeywordsAddiction, Adolescence, Depression, Development, Impulsivity, NeuroimagingDOI10.1007/s40501-017-0108-y |